Background & Biography
Shirzad’s professional background combines finance, law and public policy. He earned a finance degree at the University of Maryland, a master’s in public policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a law degree at the University of Virginia. Before entering government, he practiced international trade law. These disciplines supplied different perspectives on the same problem: how commercial activity crosses borders and how governments decide the conditions under which it can do so.
The White House’s contemporaneous personnel announcement records his service as international trade counsel to the Senate Finance Committee from 1997 to 2001 and assistant secretary for import administration at the Department of Commerce from 2001 to 2003. He subsequently joined the National Security Council staff. In June 2004, President George W. Bush selected him as deputy assistant to the president for international economic affairs and deputy national security adviser. His later responsibilities included acting as the president’s representative in preparations for G-8 meetings.
A University of Maryland career interview places his move to Goldman Sachs in 2006. There, he became global co-head of government affairs, working on public policy and government relations across jurisdictions. Coinbase announced his recruitment as chief policy officer in May 2021, after approximately fifteen years at the bank. The transition brought an experienced financial-sector advocate into a digital-asset company whose products raised unfamiliar questions for established regulatory institutions.
His current position is corroborated by the House committee record for the September 15, 2026 hearing on digital assets and small businesses. The United States is the principal policy market examined here, while his stated remit extends internationally. That geographic description concerns the institutions and markets he engages with. It does not establish a current city of residence, citizenship or a personal base from Coinbase’s corporate address.
Notable Contributions
One identifiable early contribution was Coinbase’s 2021 Digital Asset Policy Proposal, introduced in a post under Shirzad’s name. It advocated a dedicated framework for digital assets, a single federal market regulator, protections for asset holders and interoperability between services. It also distinguished intermediaries controlling customer assets from software developers and other participants without that control. The proposal was a company-authored intervention in the policy debate, rather than a law, regulatory permission or a settlement of how existing legislation applied.
The document is useful because it makes Coinbase’s preferred market design visible. Combining trading, custody and related services within an authorized digital-asset marketplace could have important implications for competition and oversight. Evaluating that model requires asking how conflicts are managed and how customers can understand the risks they take. Shirzad’s contribution was to help articulate the model and put it before policymakers; its desirability remains a question for public scrutiny.
His work also extends to the detailed implementation of stablecoin legislation. In November 2025, he signed Coinbase’s response to the Treasury consultation on implementing the GENIUS Act. Among its positions, the company argued that the statute’s restriction on issuer-paid interest should not be extended to rewards offered by non-issuer intermediaries. That was a legal and policy argument advanced by a commercially interested participant. A submitted comment does not itself determine the final interpretation adopted by regulators or courts.
In an August 2026 CoinDesk opinion article, Shirzad continued the argument over stablecoin rewards, challenging banking-industry concerns about deposit displacement. The article presented his interpretation of economic evidence and defended rewards as part of stablecoin use. Its relevance is the specificity of the dispute: payment incentives, customer balances and the boundary between bank-like products and other financial services. The underlying empirical claims require their own evaluation and should not become Katharos.ai conclusions merely because an executive cites them.
His September 2026 written testimony brought a different audience into the discussion: smaller businesses considering digital-asset tools. He linked adoption to predictable rules, practical payment use and reduced administrative friction, while recognizing fraud and illicit-finance risks. He called for durable market-structure legislation and attention to obstacles such as the tax treatment of small payments. This testimony documents advocacy directed at congressional decisions; it does not demonstrate that the proposed benefits have been achieved by every business using crypto.
Why Katharos.ai Follows Faryar Shirzad
Katharos.ai follows Shirzad because the design of financial rules can shape access to infrastructure as strongly as a product launch. His public record makes it possible to trace an argument from a broad framework, through consultation documents, to narrower disputes about commercial incentives. That continuity gives readers a way to compare what a company originally requested with the rules eventually adopted. It also helps distinguish changing political language from substantive changes in the proposed treatment of customers and intermediaries.
His earlier government work is relevant to understanding the professional experience he brings to these discussions. It is not evidence of continuing public authority or privileged control over decisions. At Coinbase, he represents an industry participant with business interests, alongside other participants, consumer groups, legislators and regulators. Coverage should therefore examine the arguments and their consequences without treating institutional access as proof that a position is correct.
Areas to Follow
- Market-structure legislation: compare the definitions, jurisdictional boundaries and customer protections Shirzad advocates with enacted texts and implementing rules, keeping proposals separate from binding requirements. - Stablecoin rewards: track how authorities distinguish issuer obligations, intermediary incentives and payment-related benefits, and whether evidence supports claims about adoption or bank funding. - Small-business use: examine independently documented costs, settlement times, accounting burdens and consumer recourse rather than relying on generalized claims that blockchain payments are cheaper. - International coordination: watch whether Coinbase’s global advocacy supports workable cross-border standards, and where national requirements continue to produce different obligations. - Transparency of advocacy: connect public submissions and testimony to identifiable commercial interests, while avoiding assumptions about private negotiations or a single executive’s influence over a vote.
Reporting Scope
This profile covers Shirzad’s public professional history, company policy proposals and attributable statements. Archived government records anchor his earlier offices; current congressional materials corroborate his Coinbase role. His testimony and signed submissions are primary evidence of what he argued, not independent proof of the economic effects he described. The profile does not provide legal advice, assess the suitability of Coinbase products or imply that its source list amounts to an exhaustive review of the company’s conduct.
Areas of Influence
Policy & Regulation is the central category because Shirzad’s documented work concerns legislation, rulemaking and the allocation of supervisory responsibility. Exchanges & Infrastructure reflects the market organization and intermediary obligations addressed in Coinbase’s proposals. Stablecoins & Payments captures the increasingly concrete debate over payment instruments, rewards and business adoption. Across these categories, the influence being tracked is professional advocacy and agenda-setting, with public authorities retaining responsibility for law and regulation.
Katharos.ai publishes this profile for information, based on the sources listed. Inclusion is not an endorsement of the individual, their organizations, or any investment product.
Source notice: Information and images are attributed to the external sources listed. Katharos.ai does not endorse the subjects or claims described and does not independently certify the authenticity of every source statement or image.